2000 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.4 (60 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.25/100
2000 Skoda Fabia vs 2000 Rover Mini MK Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Rover
Mini MK
Rover Mini MK 2000Overall Score43.5/100
WINNER
Rover Mini MK
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationRover Mini MK
SkodaMakeRover
FabiaModelMini MK
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationRover Mini MK
16,5 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
157 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1397 ccEngine displacement1273 cc
60 HPPower63 HP
118 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationRover Mini MK
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank34 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationRover Mini MK
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
165/70 R 14Tyre size145/70 R12
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationRover Mini MK
3960 mmLength3100 mm
1646 mmWidth1440 mm
1451 mmHeight1350 mm
1140 KgWeight700 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2035 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Skoda Fabia and 2000 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…