2004 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.4 16V (101 Hp) 2004Overall Score51.25/100
2004 Skoda Fabia vs 2004 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.4 16V (101 Hp) 2004Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.
51.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
SkodaMakeVolkswagen
FabiaModelPolo
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
11,5 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
185 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
101 HPPower101 HP
126 NmTorque126 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/55 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
3960 mmLength3743 mm
1645 mmWidth1632 mm
1450 mmHeight1418 mm
1075 KgWeight925 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2407 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Skoda Fabia and 2004 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…