DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Skoda Fabia vs 1999 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Fabia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeSkoda
FabiaModelFabia
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
185 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
101 HPPower101 HP
126 NmTorque126 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
7 ltAverage consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3960 mmLength3960 mm
1645 mmWidth1645 mm
1450 mmHeight1450 mm
1075 KgWeight1075 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Skoda Fabia and 1999 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…