2016 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI (110 Hp) 2016Overall Score62.25/100
2016 Skoda Fabia vs 2020 Renault Clio Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2020 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio Icon 2020 1.3 TCe 130 HPOverall Score74/100
WINNER
Renault Clio
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 11.75 points.
62.25–74
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationRenault Clio
SkodaMakeRenault
FabiaModelClio
2016Model year2020
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationRenault Clio
9,4 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
196 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1332 cc
110 HPPower130 HP
175 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationRenault Clio
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank42 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption6,7 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7
—TransmissionEDC
185/60 R15Tyre size17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationRenault Clio
3992 mmLength4050 mm
1732 mmWidth1798 mm
1467 mmHeight1440 mm
1129 KgWeight1233 kg
—Luggage capacity391 lt
2470 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Skoda Fabia and 2020 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 11.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…