DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Skoda Fabia vs 2010 Toyota Belta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Belta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeToyota
FabiaModelBelta
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

16,5 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
155 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1198 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
60 HPPower86 HP
108 NmTorque124 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank42 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

3992 mmLength4300 mm
1642 mmWidth1895 mm
1498 mmHeight1460 mm
1040 KgWeight—
2462 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Skoda Fabia and 2010 Toyota Belta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Belta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…