2004 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.2 i (54 Hp) 2004Overall Score56.25/100
2004 Skoda Fabia vs 2005 Chevrolet Metro Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Chevrolet
Metro
Chevrolet Metro 1.0 i (56 Hp) 2005Overall Score55.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationChevrolet Metro
SkodaMakeChevrolet
FabiaModelMetro
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationChevrolet Metro
151 km/hTop speed145 km/h
1198 ccEngine displacement993 cc
54 HPPower56 HP
106 NmTorque78 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationChevrolet Metro
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank39 lt
—Urban consumption5,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationChevrolet Metro
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14Tyre size155/80 R13
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationChevrolet Metro
4222 mmLength3790 mm
1646 mmWidth1590 mm
1449 mmHeight1390 mm
—Weight860 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Skoda Fabia and 2005 Chevrolet Metro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…