2017 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI (110 Hp) 2017Overall Score65.25/100
2017 Skoda Fabia vs 2017 Nissan Pulsar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Nissan
Pulsar
Nissan Pulsar Tekna 2017 1.2 115 HPOverall Score64.25/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
65.25–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationNissan Pulsar
SkodaMakeNissan
FabiaModelPulsar
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationNissan Pulsar
9,5 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
196 km/hTop speed185 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
110 HPPower115 HP
200 NmTorque165 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationNissan Pulsar
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank46 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationNissan Pulsar
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears—
—TransmissionX-Tronic
185/60 R15 HTyre size16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationNissan Pulsar
3992 mmLength4387 mm
1732 mmWidth1768 mm
1467 mmHeight1520 mm
1055 KgWeight1290 kg
—Luggage capacity385 lt
2470 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Skoda Fabia and 2017 Nissan Pulsar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…