2017 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI (110 Hp) 2017Overall Score65.25/100
2017 Skoda Fabia vs 2017 Nissan Juke Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Nissan
Juke
Nissan Juke Skypack 2017 1.2 115 HPOverall Score64.25/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
65.25–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationNissan Juke
SkodaMakeNissan
FabiaModelJuke
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationNissan Juke
9,5 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
196 km/hTop speed178 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
110 HPPower115 HP
200 NmTorque190 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationNissan Juke
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank46 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationNissan Juke
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
6Gears6
—TransmissionManual
185/60 R15 HTyre size16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationNissan Juke
3992 mmLength4135 mm
1732 mmWidth1767 mm
1467 mmHeight1565 mm
1055 KgWeight1236 kg
—Luggage capacity354 lt
2470 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Skoda Fabia and 2017 Nissan Juke approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…