2005 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.0 (50 Hp) 2005Overall Score40.5/100
2005 Skoda Fabia vs 2003 Smart Fortwo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Smart
Fortwo
Smart Fortwo 0.7 i (50 Hp) 2003Overall Score39.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
40.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSmart Fortwo
SkodaMakeSmart
FabiaModelFortwo
2005Model year2003
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats2
5Doors3
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSmart Fortwo
21,6 s0–100 km/h18,3 s
147 km/hTop speed135 km/h
997 ccEngine displacement698 cc
50 HPPower50 HP
84 NmTorque80 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSmart Fortwo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank33 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSmart Fortwo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
165/70 R14Tyre size145/65 R15; 175/55 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSmart Fortwo
4220 mmLength2500 mm
1646 mmWidth1515 mm
1452 mmHeight1549 mm
1010 KgWeight805 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase1812 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Skoda Fabia and 2003 Smart Fortwo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…