DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 BMW 3 Serisi vs 1990 Mazda Capella Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Capella

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeMazda
3 SerisiModelCapella
1990Model year1990
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h—
187 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
113 HPPower116 HP
162 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14Tyre size165/80 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

4325 mmLength4515 mm
1645 mmWidth1690 mm
1370 mmHeight1395 mm
1220 KgWeight—
2570 mmWheelbase2575 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 BMW 3 Serisi and 1990 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Capella leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…