DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 BMW 3 Serisi vs 1989 Ford Sierra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Sierra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeFord
3 SerisiModelSierra
1989Model year1989
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
129 HPPower120 HP
164 NmTorque171 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,0 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4325 mmLength4425 mm
1645 mmWidth1694 mm
1370 mmHeight1407 mm
1280 KgWeight—
2570 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 BMW 3 Serisi and 1989 Ford Sierra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Sierra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…