DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1976 BMW 3 Serisi vs 1976 Saab 95 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 95

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationSaab 95
BMWMakeSaab
3 SerisiModel95
1976Model year1976
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats7
2Doors3

Performance

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationSaab 95
12,5 s0–100 km/h—
167 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1573 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
90 HPPower65 HP
0 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationSaab 95
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank38 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationSaab 95
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4

Dimensions

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationSaab 95
4355 mmLength4410 mm
1610 mmWidth1588 mm
1380 mmHeight1492 mm
1020 KgWeight971 Kg
2563 mmWheelbase2498 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1976 BMW 3 Serisi and 1976 Saab 95 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 95 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…