DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Seat Toledo vs 1996 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeFord
ToledoModelMondeo
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,4 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
150 HPPower136 HP
180 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank61 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4321 mmLength4631 mm
1662 mmWidth1749 mm
1424 mmHeight1442 mm
1150 KgWeight1405 Kg
2475 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Seat Toledo and 1996 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…