DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Seat Toledo vs 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeMitsubishi
ToledoModelLancer
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

16,5 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
165 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1755 cc
68 HPPower97 HP
150 NmTorque141 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption11,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/70 R 13Tyre size175/70 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

4321 mmLength4235 mm
1662 mmWidth1670 mm
1424 mmHeight1405 mm
1050 KgWeight1135 Kg
2471 mmWheelbase2455 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Seat Toledo and 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…