DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Seat Toledo vs 2016 Ford Tourneo Courier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Toledo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2 points.

60.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeFord
ToledoModelTourneo Courier
2013Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
190 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
105 HPPower95 HP
250 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank48 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption4,7 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption4,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15; 215/45 R16Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4482 mmLength4157 mm
1706 mmWidth1976 mm
1461 mmHeight1723 mm
1265 KgWeight1280 Kg
2602 mmWheelbase2489 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Seat Toledo and 2016 Ford Tourneo Courier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Toledo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…