2003 • Seat
Toledo
Seat Toledo 1.6 16V (105 Hp) 2003Overall Score51.25/100
2003 Seat Toledo vs 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 i 16V (98 Hp) 2003Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Seat Toledo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat ToledoSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
SeatMakeMitsubishi
ToledoModelLancer
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Seat ToledoSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
10,9 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
192 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
105 HPPower98 HP
148 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Seat ToledoSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Seat ToledoSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Seat ToledoSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
4439 mmLength4485 mm
1742 mmWidth1695 mm
1436 mmHeight1480 mm
1266 KgWeight1360 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Seat Toledo and 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Seat Toledo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…