DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 BMW 2 Serisi vs 2016 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW 2 Serisi

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW 2 SerisiSpecificationMazda 3
BMWMakeMazda
2 SerisiModel3
2016Model year2016
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

BMW 2 SerisiSpecificationMazda 3
12,9 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
185 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
95 HPPower105 HP
220 NmTorque270 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW 2 SerisiSpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank51 lt
4,4 ltUrban consumption4,3 lt
3,4 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW 2 SerisiSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16 92V; 225/45 R18Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW 2 SerisiSpecificationMazda 3
4342 mmLength4460 mm
1800 mmWidth1795 mm
1555 mmHeight1450 mm
1350 KgWeight1270 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 BMW 2 Serisi and 2016 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW 2 Serisi leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…