DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Seat Leon vs 2002 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Leon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeLand Rover
LeonModelRange Rover
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
235 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2926 cc
204 HPPower177 HP
265 NmTorque390 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank100 lt
15,5 ltUrban consumption14,4 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
225/45 R17Tyre size255/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4184 mmLength4950 mm
1742 mmWidth1955 mm
1457 mmHeight1860 mm
1558 KgWeight2500 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Seat Leon and 2002 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Leon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…