DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Seat Leon vs 2000 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeRenault
LeonModelClio
1998Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
170 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
128 NmTorque114 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption9,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/80 R14Tyre size175/70 R13; 175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4184 mmLength4150 mm
1742 mmWidth1639 mm
1457 mmHeight1416 mm
1210 KgWeight940 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Seat Leon and 2000 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…