DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Seat Ibiza vs 2004 Toyota Matrix Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Matrix

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeToyota
IbizaModelMatrix
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h—
207 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
130 HPPower132 HP
310 NmTorque171 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3955 mmLength4350 mm
1700 mmWidth1775 mm
1440 mmHeight1540 mm
1190 KgWeight1215 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Seat Ibiza and 2004 Toyota Matrix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…