DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Seat Exeo vs 2010 Nissan X-Trail Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Exeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeNissan
ExeoModelX-Trail
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
241 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
200 HPPower173 HP
280 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/55 R16; 225/45 R17; 225/40 R18Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4661 mmLength4630 mm
1772 mmWidth1785 mm
1430 mmHeight1685 mm
1430 KgWeight1651 Kg
2642 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Seat Exeo and 2010 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Exeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…