DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Seat Exeo vs 2012 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Seat ExeoSpecificationMazda CX-5
SeatMakeMazda
ExeoModelCX-5
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Seat ExeoSpecificationMazda CX-5
10,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
204 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
120 HPPower160 HP
290 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Seat ExeoSpecificationMazda CX-5
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Seat ExeoSpecificationMazda CX-5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Seat ExeoSpecificationMazda CX-5
4661 mmLength4555 mm
1772 mmWidth1840 mm
1430 mmHeight1710 mm
1505 KgWeight1488 Kg
2642 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Seat Exeo and 2012 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…