DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Bertone Freeclimber vs 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Bertone Freeclimber

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

48–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BertoneMakeMitsubishi
FreeclimberModelLancer
1992Model year1992
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,6 s
160 km/hTop speed240 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
129 HPPower140 HP
0 NmTorque168 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption11,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,6 lt
—Average consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size185/50 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

1580 KgWeight1040 Kg

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Bertone Freeclimber and 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Bertone Freeclimber leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…