2000 • Seat
Cordoba
Seat Cordoba 1.4 (60 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.25/100
2000 Seat Cordoba vs 2000 Rover Mini MK Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Rover
Mini MK
Rover Mini MK 2000Overall Score43.5/100
WINNER
Rover Mini MK
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat CordobaSpecificationRover Mini MK
SeatMakeRover
CordobaModelMini MK
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Seat CordobaSpecificationRover Mini MK
15,9 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
157 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1273 cc
60 HPPower63 HP
116 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Seat CordobaSpecificationRover Mini MK
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank34 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Seat CordobaSpecificationRover Mini MK
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/60 R14Tyre size145/70 R12
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Seat CordobaSpecificationRover Mini MK
4163 mmLength3100 mm
1640 mmWidth1440 mm
1424 mmHeight1350 mm
1018 KgWeight700 Kg
2443 mmWheelbase2035 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Seat Cordoba and 2000 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…