2000 • Seat
Arosa
Seat Arosa 1.7 SDI (60 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.25/100
2000 Seat Arosa vs 2000 Tata Mint Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Tata
Mint
Tata Mint 1.4 (60 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.5/100
WINNER
Tata Mint
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat ArosaSpecificationTata Mint
SeatMakeTata
ArosaModelMint
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Seat ArosaSpecificationTata Mint
16,8 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
157 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1716 ccEngine displacement1405 cc
60 HPPower60 HP
115 NmTorque105 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Seat ArosaSpecificationTata Mint
DieselFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank37 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption—
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Seat ArosaSpecificationTata Mint
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/65 R13Tyre size155/70 R13
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Seat ArosaSpecificationTata Mint
3536 mmLength3660 mm
1639 mmWidth1625 mm
1480 mmHeight1480 mm
955 KgWeight850 Kg
2323 mmWheelbase2400 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Seat Arosa and 2000 Tata Mint approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Tata Mint leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…