1998 • Seat
Arosa
Seat Arosa 1.7 SDI (60 Hp) 1998Overall Score42.25/100
1998 Seat Arosa vs 1998 Rover Mini MK Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Rover
Mini MK
Rover Mini MK 1998Overall Score42.5/100
WINNER
Rover Mini MK
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover Mini MK
SeatMakeRover
ArosaModelMini MK
1998Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3
Performance
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover Mini MK
16,8 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
157 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1716 ccEngine displacement1273 cc
60 HPPower63 HP
115 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover Mini MK
DieselFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank34 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover Mini MK
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/65 R13Tyre size145/70 R12
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover Mini MK
3536 mmLength3100 mm
1639 mmWidth1440 mm
1480 mmHeight1350 mm
955 KgWeight700 Kg
2323 mmWheelbase2035 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Seat Arosa and 1998 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…