2003 • Seat
Arosa
Seat Arosa 1.4 TDI (75 Hp) 2003Overall Score50.25/100
2003 Seat Arosa vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • MG
ZR
MG ZR 1.4 i 16V (103 Hp) 2003Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
MG ZR
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat ArosaSpecificationMG ZR
SeatMakeMG
ArosaModelZR
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Seat ArosaSpecificationMG ZR
12,2 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
170 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
75 HPPower103 HP
195 NmTorque123 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Seat ArosaSpecificationMG ZR
DieselFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Seat ArosaSpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55R14Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Seat ArosaSpecificationMG ZR
3536 mmLength4011 mm
1639 mmWidth1690 mm
1460 mmHeight1400 mm
965 KgWeight1060 Kg
2323 mmWheelbase2502 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Seat Arosa and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…