2000 • Seat
Arosa
Seat Arosa 1.4 TDI (75 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
2000 Seat Arosa vs 2000 Rover 400 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Rover
400
Rover 400 2000Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Rover 400
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover 400
SeatMakeRover
ArosaModel400
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover 400
12,2 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
170 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
75 HPPower103 HP
195 NmTorque127 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover 400
DieselFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover 400
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover 400
3536 mmLength4490 mm
1639 mmWidth1695 mm
1460 mmHeight1390 mm
965 KgWeight1120 Kg
2323 mmWheelbase2622 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Seat Arosa and 2000 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…