2000 • Seat
Arosa
Seat Arosa 1.4 TDI (75 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
2000 Seat Arosa vs 2000 Rover 25 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.4 i 16V (103 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover 25
SeatMakeRover
ArosaModel25
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover 25
12,2 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
170 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
75 HPPower103 HP
195 NmTorque123 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover 25
DieselFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55R14Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover 25
3536 mmLength3990 mm
1639 mmWidth1688 mm
1460 mmHeight1417 mm
965 KgWeight1105 Kg
2323 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Seat Arosa and 2000 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…