DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Seat Arosa vs 2005 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Arosa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeRenault
ArosaModelClio
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
188 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
100 HPPower86 HP
126 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R14Tyre size185/60/R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

3536 mmLength3818 mm
1639 mmWidth1639 mm
1460 mmHeight1417 mm
946 KgWeight1175 Kg
2323 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Seat Arosa and 2005 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Arosa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…