2004 • Seat
Arosa
Seat Arosa 1.4 16V (100 Hp) 2004Overall Score54.25/100
2004 Seat Arosa vs 2004 Smart Forfour Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Smart
Forfour
Smart Forfour 1.5 cdi (95 Hp) 2004Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Seat Arosa
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat ArosaSpecificationSmart Forfour
SeatMakeSmart
ArosaModelForfour
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
3Doors5
Performance
Seat ArosaSpecificationSmart Forfour
9,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
188 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1493 cc
100 HPPower95 HP
126 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Seat ArosaSpecificationSmart Forfour
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
34 ltFuel tank47 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Seat ArosaSpecificationSmart Forfour
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Seat ArosaSpecificationSmart Forfour
3536 mmLength3752 mm
1639 mmWidth1684 mm
1460 mmHeight1450 mm
946 KgWeight965 Kg
2323 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Seat Arosa and 2004 Smart Forfour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Seat Arosa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…