DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Seat Arosa vs 2003 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Arosa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeRenault
ArosaModelMegane
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
4Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
188 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower107 HP
126 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R14Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3536 mmLength4082 mm
1639 mmWidth1698 mm
1460 mmHeight1368 mm
946 KgWeight1125 Kg
2323 mmWheelbase2468 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Seat Arosa and 2003 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Arosa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…