2000 • Seat
Arosa
Seat Arosa 1.4 16V (100 Hp) 2000Overall Score54.25/100
2000 Seat Arosa vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Alfa Romeo
156
Alfa Romeo 156 1.6 16V T.S. (120 Hp) 2000Overall Score53.5/100
WINNER
Seat Arosa
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat ArosaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
SeatMakeAlfa Romeo
ArosaModel156
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Seat ArosaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
9,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
188 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower120 HP
126 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Seat ArosaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank63 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Seat ArosaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R14Tyre size185/65R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Seat ArosaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
3536 mmLength4430 mm
1639 mmWidth1745 mm
1460 mmHeight1415 mm
946 KgWeight1230 Kg
2323 mmWheelbase2595 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Seat Arosa and 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Seat Arosa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…