DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Seat Arosa vs 2000 Honda Civic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Arosa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeHonda
ArosaModelCivic
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
188 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
100 HPPower116 HP
126 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption9 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3536 mmLength4325 mm
1639 mmWidth1695 mm
1460 mmHeight1390 mm
946 KgWeight1155 Kg
2323 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Seat Arosa and 2000 Honda Civic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Arosa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…