DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Seat Arosa vs 2004 Lancia Musa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Arosa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeLancia
ArosaModelMusa
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeMPV
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

14,7 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
164 km/hTop speed159 km/h
1191 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
61 HPPower70 HP
140 NmTorque180 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
34 ltFuel tank47 lt
3,6 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
2,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5 Dualogic
155/65R14Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

3529 mmLength3985 mm
1621 mmWidth1698 mm
1455 mmHeight1688 mm
860 KgWeight1200 Kg
2319 mmWheelbase2508 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Seat Arosa and 2004 Lancia Musa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Arosa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…