2000 • Seat
Arosa
Seat Arosa 1.2 TDI 3L (61 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Seat Arosa vs 1997 Rover 100 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Rover
100
Rover 100 1997Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Seat Arosa
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover 100
SeatMakeRover
ArosaModel100
2000Model year1997
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover 100
14,7 s0–100 km/h14,8 s
164 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1191 ccEngine displacement1119 cc
61 HPPower60 HP
140 NmTorque90 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover 100
DieselFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank35 lt
3,6 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
2,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption6,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover 100
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65R14Tyre size155/65 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Seat ArosaSpecificationRover 100
3529 mmLength3521 mm
1621 mmWidth1550 mm
1455 mmHeight1377 mm
860 KgWeight840 Kg
2319 mmWheelbase2269 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Seat Arosa and 1997 Rover 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Seat Arosa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…