2000 • Seat
Arosa
Seat Arosa 1.2 TDI 3L (61 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Seat Arosa vs 1998 Renault Clio Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.1 (B/C/SB0A,B/CB0F) 1998Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Seat Arosa
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat ArosaSpecificationRenault Clio
SeatMakeRenault
ArosaModelClio
2000Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Seat ArosaSpecificationRenault Clio
14,7 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
164 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1191 ccEngine displacement1149 cc
61 HPPower58 HP
140 NmTorque93 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Seat ArosaSpecificationRenault Clio
DieselFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank50 lt
3,6 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
2,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Seat ArosaSpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65R14Tyre size165/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Seat ArosaSpecificationRenault Clio
3529 mmLength3773 mm
1621 mmWidth1640 mm
1455 mmHeight1417 mm
860 KgWeight880 Kg
2319 mmWheelbase2475 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Seat Arosa and 1998 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Seat Arosa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…