2017 • Seat
Arona
Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSI (95 Hp) 2017Overall Score55.25/100
2017 Seat Arona vs 2017 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Alfa Romeo
MiTo
Alfa Romeo MiTo 0.9 TwinAir Turbo (105 Hp) 2017Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Alfa Romeo MiTo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
55.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat AronaSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
SeatMakeAlfa Romeo
AronaModelMiTo
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
5Doors3
Performance
Seat AronaSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
11,4 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
173 km/hTop speed184 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement875 cc
95 HPPower105 HP
175 NmTorque145 Nm
3Cylinders2
Fuel & Consumption
Seat AronaSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption5,0 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Seat AronaSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/60 R16; 205/55 R17; 215/45 R18Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Seat AronaSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
4138 mmLength4063 mm
1780 mmWidth1720 mm
1552 mmHeight1446 mm
1090 KgWeight1130 Kg
2566 mmWheelbase2511 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Seat Arona and 2017 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…