DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Seat Altea vs 2009 Nissan X-Trail Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Altea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeNissan
AlteaModelX-Trail
2009Model year2009
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

7,6 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
218 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
211 HPPower173 HP
280 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,0 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 DSGGears6
225/50 R17 94WTyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4493 mmLength4630 mm
1788 mmWidth1785 mm
1622 mmHeight1685 mm
1661 KgWeight1651 Kg
2576 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Seat Altea and 2009 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Altea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…