DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Seat Altea vs 2010 Lotus Elise Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lotus Elise

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeLotus
AlteaModelElise
2010Model year2010
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h4,6 s
204 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
170 HPPower180 HP
350 NmTorque171 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/50 R17 94WTyre size195/50 R15; 225/45 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4493 mmLength3620 mm
1788 mmWidth1702 mm
1622 mmHeight1123 mm
1615 KgWeight660 Kg
2576 mmWheelbase2300 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Seat Altea and 2010 Lotus Elise approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lotus Elise leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…