DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Seat Altea vs 2004 Honda S2000 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda S2000

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeHonda
AlteaModelS2000
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h6,2 s
208 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
170 HPPower240 HP
350 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption9,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre sizeFront tyres: 215/45 R17 89W, Rear tyres: 245/40 R17 92W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4325 mmLength4135 mm
1768 mmWidth1750 mm
1568 mmHeight1270 mm
1446 KgWeight1270 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Seat Altea and 2004 Honda S2000 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda S2000 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…