DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Seat Altea vs 2004 Smart Forfour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Altea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeSmart
AlteaModelForfour
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
184 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1493 cc
105 HPPower95 HP
175 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank47 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 225/45 R17; 225/40 R18Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4282 mmLength3752 mm
1768 mmWidth1684 mm
1576 mmHeight1450 mm
1355 KgWeight965 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Seat Altea and 2004 Smart Forfour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Altea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…