DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Seat Altea vs 2004 Lancia Musa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Altea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeLancia
AlteaModelMusa
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
184 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
105 HPPower90 HP
175 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank47 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 225/45 R17; 225/40 R18Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4282 mmLength3985 mm
1768 mmWidth1698 mm
1576 mmHeight1688 mm
1355 KgWeight1200 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2508 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Seat Altea and 2004 Lancia Musa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Altea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…