DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Seat Alhambra vs 2002 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Alhambra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeLand Rover
AlhambraModelRange Rover
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
214 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2926 cc
204 HPPower177 HP
265 NmTorque390 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank100 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption14,4 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
11 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/55 R16Tyre size255/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4634 mmLength4950 mm
1810 mmWidth1955 mm
1707 mmHeight1860 mm
1786 KgWeight2500 Kg
2841 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Seat Alhambra and 2002 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Alhambra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…