DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Seat Alhambra vs 2001 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeMitsubishi
AlhambraModelChallenger
2001Model year2001
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
214 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
204 HPPower185 HP
265 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank74 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption16 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
11 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears4
215/55 R16Tyre size265/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4634 mmLength4530 mm
1810 mmWidth1775 mm
1707 mmHeight1730 mm
1786 KgWeight1830 Kg
2841 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Seat Alhambra and 2001 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…