DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Seat Alhambra vs 2017 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeChevrolet
AlhambraModelCaptiva
2017Model year2017
MPVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
215 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement2231 cc
184 HPPower184 HP
380 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption10 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16; 215/60 R16; 225/50 R17; 225/45 R18Tyre size215/70 R16; 235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4854 mmLength4673 mm
1904 mmWidth1849 mm
1720 mmHeight1756 mm
1725/1766 KgWeight—
2919 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Seat Alhambra and 2017 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…