DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Seat Alhambra vs 2015 Mazda CX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeMazda
AlhambraModelCX-3
2015Model year2015
MPVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
340 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank44 lt
—Urban consumption8,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/60 R16; 215/60 R16; 225/50 R17; 225/50 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4854 mmLength4275 mm
1904 mmWidth1765 mm
1720 mmHeight1535 mm
1700/1747 KgWeight1235 Kg
2919 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Seat Alhambra and 2015 Mazda CX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…