DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Seat Alhambra vs 2010 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeSubaru
AlhambraModelForester
2011Model year2010
MPVBody typeCrossover
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
191 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque196 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
205/60 R16 96H; 215/60 R16 95H; 225/50 R17 98H; 225/45 R18 95WTyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4854 mmLength4485 mm
1904 mmWidth1735 mm
1720 mmHeight1590 mm
1891/1942 KgWeight1390 Kg
2919 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Seat Alhambra and 2010 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…