DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Seat Alhambra vs 1996 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

48.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeMazda
AlhambraModel626
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

19,3 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
160 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower75 HP
202 NmTorque169 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15 88 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4620 mmLength4700 mm
1810 mmWidth1750 mm
1730 mmHeight1400 mm
1678 KgWeight1265 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Seat Alhambra and 1996 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…