DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Seat Alhambra vs 2000 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeSubaru
AlhambraModelForester
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeCrossover
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,4 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
172 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
110 HPPower122 HP
235 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size205/70R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4617 mmLength4450 mm
1810 mmWidth1735 mm
1728 mmHeight1590 mm
1754 KgWeight1380 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Seat Alhambra and 2000 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…